Click
here to close Hello! We notice that
you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Echinobase
and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a
current version of Chrome,
FireFox,
or Safari.
BMC Biol
2013 Jun 27;11:68. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-11-68.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Intact cluster and chordate-like expression of ParaHox genes in a sea star.
Annunziata R
,
Martinez P
,
Arnone MI
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
BACKGROUND: The ParaHox genes are thought to be major players in patterning the gut of several bilaterian taxa. Though this is a fundamental role that these transcription factors play, their activities are not limited to the endoderm and extend to both ectodermal and mesodermal tissues. Three genes compose the ParaHox group: Gsx, Xlox and Cdx. In some taxa (mostly chordates but to some degree also in protostomes) the three genes are arranged into a genomic cluster, in a similar fashion to what has been shown for the better-known Hox genes. Sea urchins possess the full complement of ParaHox genes but they are all dispersed throughout the genome, an arrangement that, perhaps, represented the primitive condition for all echinoderms. In order to understand the evolutionary history of this group of genes we cloned and characterized all ParaHox genes, studied their expression patterns and identified their genomic loci in a member of an earlier branching group of echinoderms, the asteroid Patiria miniata.
RESULTS: We identified the three ParaHox orthologs in the genome of P. miniata. While one of them, PmGsx is provided as maternal message, with no zygotic activation afterwards, the other two, PmLox and PmCdx are expressed during embryogenesis, within restricted domains of both endoderm and ectoderm. Screening of a Patiria bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library led to the identification of a clone containing the three genes. The transcriptional directions of PmGsx and PmLox are opposed to that of the PmCdx gene within the cluster.
CONCLUSIONS: The identification of P. miniata ParaHox genes has revealed the fact that these genes are clustered in the genome, in contrast to what has been reported for echinoids. Since the presence of an intact cluster, or at least a partial cluster, has been reported in chordates and polychaetes respectively, it becomes clear that within echinoderms, sea urchins have modified the original bilaterian arrangement. Moreover, the sea star ParaHox domains of expression show chordate-like features not found in the sea urchin, confirming that the dynamics of gene expression for the respective genes and their putative regulatory interactions have clearly changed over evolutionary time within the echinoid lineage.
Figure 1. Identification of the sea star Patiria miniata ParaHox orthologs. (A) Alignment of the homeodomains of the three P. miniata ParaHox genes with representative invertebrate and vertebrate orthologs. Broken lines indicate amino acid identities; the position of PmCdx intron within the homeodomain is indicated by a vertical arrow. The names of the species are: Sp (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus); Pf (Ptychodera flava); Ci (Ciona intestinalis); m (Mus musculus); Dfd (Drosophila melanogaster); Xl (Xenopus laevis); Htr (Helobdella triserialis); Bf (Branchiostoma floridae). ind and caudal are the Drosophila melanogastervorthologs of Gsx and Cdx respectively. (B) The genomic organization of P. miniata ParaHox genes is represented in scale showing separate exons for each gene. Asterisks indicate the homeobox in each gene. kb: kilobases.
Figure 2. Relative temporal expression profiles of ParaHox genes during Patiria miniata development. The graph shows the relative transcript abundance normalized against ubiquitin mRNA levels during sea star development. mRNA levels were measured by QPCR from cDNA templates prepared from whole embryos at the indicated developmental times. The results are expressed as percentage of the maximum value corresponding to PmCdx level of expression at 24 hpf. Due to the low levels of PmGsx transcript abundance, a separate graph has been created for PmGsx alone (see inset) expressing the results as percentage of PmGsx maximum level of expression (24 hpf). PmLox and PmGsx curves have been obtained repeating the experiments with two independent sets of primers. For the detailed experimental procedure see the relative section in Methods. Hpf, hours post fertilization.
Figure 3. Spatial expression patterns of ParaHox genes during Patiria miniata development. Panels A, B, C and D show the expression of PmLox gene. Panels E, F, G, H, I correspond to PmCdx expression. Panels J, K, L, M, N provide the expression domains for PmGsx. In panels A, D, F, L, N and J, embryos and larvae are in frontal view; in B, C, G, H, Ivand M, embryos and larvae are in lateral view; E and K are vegetal views of blastula embryos. Developmental stages are indicated in each panel.
Figure 4. PmLox and PmCdx relative expression domains in the sea star developing gut. (A, B, C) Double in situ hybridization of PmLox (green) and PmCdx (magenta) expression domains coupled with nuclei staining (blue, obtained with DAPI) in sea star embryo and larvae. In A, a gastrula embryo is shown in frontal view. In B and C, larvae are shown in lateral view. Developmental stages are provided in each panel. On the right of each developmental stage, a magnification of the gut domain expressing the two genes is provided, showing first both channels (A’, B’, C’), then the green channel only (A”, B”, C”) and then the magenta panel (A”’, B”’, C”’); nuclear staining is shown in blue. All the pictures represent full projection of confocal z-series. d, days; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
Figure 5. PmLox ectodermal domain of expression. (A, C, E)PmLox in situ hybridization developed with alkaline phosphatase methodology (A, E) and with fluorescent tyramide cy5 methodology coupled with DAPI staining (C, PmLox transcripts in green, nuclei in blue); B, D and F show acetylated tubulin immunostaining (in magenta) coupled with nuclear staining (in blue). A, B, E, Fvembryos and larvae are shown in frontal view; C and D larvae are shown in lateral view. Developmental stages are indicated in each panel. d, days; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
Figure 6. Evolution of the ParaHox gene cluster and relative expression domains in bilateral animals. Schematic representation of ParaHox genomic organization and expression patterns in several bilateral animals: the mouse Mus musculus [9,17,23,33,63], the bowfin fish Amia calva [43], the hagfish Eptatretus burgeri [64], the lancelet Branchiostoma floridae [5,11], the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus [7,19], the sea star Patiria miniata (present study) and the polychaete Platynereis dumerilii [6]. Arrows indicate ParaHox genes and their orientation in the genome; a continuous line below arrows indicates an intact cluster. The cartoons on the right side of the panel schematize the domains of expression of ParaHox genes in representatives of some of the bilaterian groups. Mouse, amphioxus, sea urchin and sea star embryos are in lateral view; the polychaete embryo is in frontal view. Nervous system domains are depicted with dashed lines. Endodermal structures are in gray. Gsx expression is shown in blue, Xlox in green and Cdx in magenta. Amphioxus Gsx expression in the hindbrain is depicted in light blue, as at the stage of development represented here, this domain of expression is fading out [11]. kb, kilobases; Chr, chromosome. Double-parallel lines indicate long genomic distance.
Arenas-Mena,
Spatial expression of Hox cluster genes in the ontogeny of a sea urchin.
2000, Pubmed,
Echinobase
Arenas-Mena,
Spatial expression of Hox cluster genes in the ontogeny of a sea urchin.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Arnone,
Genetic organization and embryonic expression of the ParaHox genes in the sea urchin S. purpuratus: insights into the relationship between clustering and colinearity.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Brooke,
The ParaHox gene cluster is an evolutionary sister of the Hox gene cluster.
1998,
Pubmed
Cameron,
Unusual gene order and organization of the sea urchin hox cluster.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Chawengsaksophak,
Cdx2 is essential for axial elongation in mouse development.
2004,
Pubmed
Cole,
Two ParaHox genes, SpLox and SpCdx, interact to partition the posterior endoderm in the formation of a functional gut.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Cole,
Fluorescent in situ hybridization reveals multiple expression domains for SpBrn1/2/4 and identifies a unique ectodermal cell type that co-expresses the ParaHox gene SpLox.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Copf,
Posterior patterning genes and the identification of a unique body region in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana.
2004,
Pubmed
Corrado,
Ci-IPF1, the pancreatic homeodomain transcription factor, is expressed in neural cells of Ciona intestinalis larva.
2001,
Pubmed
Cresko,
Genome duplication, subfunction partitioning, and lineage divergence: Sox9 in stickleback and zebrafish.
2004,
Pubmed
Duboule,
The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters.
2007,
Pubmed
Ferrier,
Ciona intestinalis ParaHox genes: evolution of Hox/ParaHox cluster integrity, developmental mode, and temporal colinearity.
2003,
Pubmed
Ferrier,
The chordate ParaHox cluster.
2006,
Pubmed
Ferrier,
Evolution of the Hox/ParaHox gene clusters.
2004,
Pubmed
Fröbius,
ParaHox gene expression in the polychaete annelid Capitella sp. I.
2006,
Pubmed
Furlong,
A degenerate ParaHox gene cluster in a degenerate vertebrate.
2008,
Pubmed
Gamer,
Murine Cdx-4 bears striking similarities to the Drosophila caudal gene in its homeodomain sequence and early expression pattern.
1994,
Pubmed
Garcia-Fernàndez,
The genesis and evolution of homeobox gene clusters.
2006,
Pubmed
Gebelein,
Specificity of Distalless repression and limb primordia development by abdominal Hox proteins.
2002,
Pubmed
Grainger,
Cdx2 regulates patterning of the intestinal epithelium.
2010,
Pubmed
Hejnol,
Coordinated spatial and temporal expression of Hox genes during embryogenesis in the acoel Convolutriloba longifissura.
2010,
Pubmed
Hinman,
Neuroectodermal and endodermal expression of the ascidian Cdx gene is separated by metamorphosis.
2001,
Pubmed
Hinman,
Expression and function of a starfish Otx ortholog, AmOtx: a conserved role for Otx proteins in endoderm development that predates divergence of the eleutherozoa.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Holland,
Beyond the Hox: how widespread is homeobox gene clustering?
2001,
Pubmed
Holland,
Evolution of homeobox genes.
2014,
Pubmed
Hsieh-Li,
Gsh-2, a murine homeobox gene expressed in the developing brain.
1995,
Pubmed
Hudson,
Induction of anterior neural fates in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis.
2001,
Pubmed
Hui,
Features of the ancestral bilaterian inferred from Platynereis dumerilii ParaHox genes.
2009,
Pubmed
Hui,
Do cnidarians have a ParaHox cluster? Analysis of synteny around a Nematostella homeobox gene cluster.
2009,
Pubmed
Ikuta,
Evolution of invertebrate deuterostomes and Hox/ParaHox genes.
2012,
Pubmed
Ikuta,
Identification of an intact ParaHox cluster with temporal colinearity but altered spatial colinearity in the hemichordate Ptychodera flava.
2014,
Pubmed
In der Rieden,
Homeodomain to hexapeptide or PBC-interaction-domain distance: size apparently matters.
2004,
Pubmed
Jakob,
The Trox-2 Hox/ParaHox gene of Trichoplax (Placozoa) marks an epithelial boundary.
2004,
Pubmed
Jonsson,
Insulin-promoter-factor 1 is required for pancreas development in mice.
1994,
Pubmed
Kriks,
Gsh2 is required for the repression of Ngn1 and specification of dorsal interneuron fate in the spinal cord.
2005,
Pubmed
Kulakova,
ParaHox gene expression in larval and postlarval development of the polychaete Nereis virens (Annelida, Lophotrochozoa).
2008,
Pubmed
Kuraishi,
Cell Movements during Gastrulation of Starfish Larvae.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Long,
Evolution of echinoderms may not have required modification of the ancestral deuterostome HOX gene cluster: first report of PG4 and PG5 Hox orthologues in echinoderms.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Lupski,
Genomic disorders: molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes.
2006,
Pubmed
Marom,
The chicken caudal genes establish an anterior-posterior gradient by partially overlapping temporal and spatial patterns of expression.
1997,
Pubmed
Martinez,
Complete sequence of SpHox8 and its linkage in the single Hox gene cluster of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Martinez,
Organization of an echinoderm Hox gene cluster.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Martín-Durán,
Evolutionary implications of morphogenesis and molecular patterning of the blind gut in the planarian Schmidtea polychroa.
2011,
Pubmed
Mendivil Ramos,
Ghost loci imply Hox and ParaHox existence in the last common ancestor of animals.
2013,
Pubmed
Meyer,
Mouse Cdx-1 expression during gastrulation.
1993,
Pubmed
Mita,
Nodal regulates neural tube formation in the Ciona intestinalis embryo.
2007,
Pubmed
Mlodzik,
Isolation of caudal, a Drosophila homeo box-containing gene with maternal expression, whose transcripts form a concentration gradient at the pre-blastoderm stage.
2010,
Pubmed
Morales,
Expression of the cCdx-B homeobox gene in chick embryo suggests its participation in rostrocaudal axial patterning.
1997,
Pubmed
Moreno,
Tracking the origins of the bilaterian Hox patterning system: insights from the acoel flatworm Symsagittifera roscoffensis.
2009,
Pubmed
Mulley,
Breakup of a homeobox cluster after genome duplication in teleosts.
2006,
Pubmed
Nakajima,
Divergent patterns of neural development in larval echinoids and asteroids.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Osborne,
Differential regulation of ParaHox genes by retinoic acid in the invertebrate chordate amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae).
2009,
Pubmed
Osborne,
Chordate Hox and ParaHox gene clusters differ dramatically in their repetitive element content.
2010,
Pubmed
Perez-Villamil,
The pancreatic homeodomain transcription factor IDX1/IPF1 is expressed in neural cells during brain development.
1999,
Pubmed
Philippe,
Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella.
2011,
Pubmed
Pisani,
Resolving phylogenetic signal from noise when divergence is rapid: a new look at the old problem of echinoderm class relationships.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Reece-Hoyes,
Cloning and expression of the Cdx family from the frog Xenopus tropicalis.
2002,
Pubmed
Samadi,
Conservation of ParaHox genes' function in patterning of the digestive tract of the marine gastropod Gibbula varia.
2010,
Pubmed
Schulz,
A caudal homologue in the short germ band beetle Tribolium shows similarities to both, the Drosophila and the vertebrate caudal expression patterns.
1998,
Pubmed
Seo,
Hox cluster disintegration with persistent anteroposterior order of expression in Oikopleura dioica.
2004,
Pubmed
Shoguchi,
Chromosomal mapping of 170 BAC clones in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis.
2006,
Pubmed
Tschopp,
Uncoupling time and space in the collinear regulation of Hox genes.
2009,
Pubmed
Valerius,
Gsh-1: a novel murine homeobox gene expressed in the central nervous system.
1996,
Pubmed
Wedeen,
Mesoderm is required for the formation of a segmented endodermal cell layer in the leech Helobdella.
1998,
Pubmed
Weiss,
Dorsoventral patterning in the Drosophila central nervous system: the intermediate neuroblasts defective homeobox gene specifies intermediate column identity.
1999,
Pubmed
Wright,
Vertebrate homeodomain proteins: families of region-specific transcription factors.
1989,
Pubmed
Yankura,
Uncoupling of complex regulatory patterning during evolution of larval development in echinoderms.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Echinobase
Young,
Hox, Cdx, and anteroposterior patterning in the mouse embryo.
2009,
Pubmed